PDA

View Full Version : Show Girls DVD (VIP Edition)


nukevor
07-27-2004, 11:28 AM
Another e-mail box thing. No link.
**************************************** ************************
SO BAD THAT IT'S OH SO GOOD
Camp classic 'Showgirls' gets new life with a special DVD set

David Germain, Associated Press

LOS ANGELES -- It was "42nd Street" with pasties, "All About Eve" with a G-string. Only those movies were cinema classics, while "Showgirls" was so bad that adjectives such as awful, wretched and appalling somehow seemed too kind.

But if a film festers in video stores long enough, its audience eventually will sniff it out.

Since it imploded critically and commercially in 1995, "Showgirls" has gained such a fringe following of movie masochists that distributor MGM is releasing a "V.I.P. Edition" DVD set today, playing up the film's campy atrociousness.

The elaborate package includes shot glasses and playing cards for "Showgirls" drinking games; glossy pictures of star Elizabeth Berkley; plus pasties, a blindfold and a poster of Berkley for a "pin-the-pasties-on-the-showgirl" game.

Among DVD extras are a tutorial on how to give a lap dance and audio commentary titled "The Greatest Movie Ever Made."

"We've targeted the DVD release to adults who have embraced the campy, fun and even outrageous aspects of the film and provided extras that deliver on that notion," Blake Thomas, MGM executive vice president for worldwide marketing, said in a statement.

Still skittish over "Showgirls," MGM executives declined interviews for this story. But the studio clearly has recovered from the drubbing well enough to realize it can recoup some of its bad investment by mocking the movie.

"They're finally allowed to admit what they have on their hands and run with it as fast and hard as they can," said David Schmader, a writer and monologuist in Seattle who provides the "Showgirls" DVD commentary.

Directed by Paul Verhoeven and written by Joe Eszterhas, the team behind "Basic Instinct," "Showgirls" was meant to kick open the door for mainstream acceptance of adult-only, NC-17-rated movies.

Instead, the movie was laughed out of theaters after grossing only $20 million, half what it cost to make.

For critics, "Showgirls" was like shooting fish in a barrel with a Gatling gun. Berkley took the worst of it for her garish masquerade as a stripper turned Vegas showgirl, but the movie also was a career low for co-stars Kyle MacLachlan and Gina Gershon. The actors declined interviews for this story.

Verhoeven was castigated for purveying soulless sleaze. Eszterhas barely worked in Hollywood again after writing the outlandish dialogue of "Showgirls," which included a bizarre exchange where Berkley and Gershon's characters discuss eating dog food.

"That one is so surreal you just can't believe you're watching it," said Schmader, who estimates he has seen "Showgirls" 100 times. "It seems like this great lost Pinter scene where subtext is everything, until you realize that there absolutely is no subtext. They're just talking about eating dog food."

Schmader did not see the movie until a couple of years after its release, then became obsessed with its awfulness and began inviting friends over for "Showgirls" video parties. He has done live commentary for the movie at screenings in Seattle and at film festivals, pointing out how the filmmakers unintentionally made an "amazing comedy."

Lin Tucci, who played stripper Henrietta "Mama" Bazoom, said she occasionally runs into fans who watch the movie for laughs.

"I do still get, 'Oh, we rented the movie, we had a party. It was fun,'" Tucci said. "It's become this campy cult classic like 'Rocky Horror Picture Show.' Why it became this, how it became this, it's a mystery. I don't know."

Patrick Bristow, who played the choreographer, said he could see during filming that dialogue and character were taking a back seat to the filmmakers' "NC-17-breaking goal."

Three or four minutes into the "Showgirls" premiere, Bristow and his partner, who sat holding hands, were almost breaking each other's fingers as they agonized over how bad the movie was, he said.

Bristow said he sympathized with Berkley, for whom "Showgirls" could have been a big-screen breakthrough after her role in the teen TV series "Saved By the Bell." Berkley was a young actress following her director's lead, he said.

"Yes, Elizabeth went over the top in certain sections. But who was supposed to rein her in, and didn't? And who let her take it in the face when the movie came out?" Bristow said. "I don't expect to be working for Mr. Verhoeven again, obviously."

The stigma of "Showgirls" has hindered her career, but Berkley managed to keep working with supporting roles in such movies as "The First Wives Club," Woody Allen's "The Curse of the Jade Scorpion" and the independent film "Roger Dodger."

Berkley recently made her Broadway debut in "Sly Fox."

"It would be a true Hollywood story for her if in five years, 10 years, 20 years, she turns in an Oscar-winning performance," Bristow said. "And everyone who had been so mean and dismissive just had to eat crow."

###

Ed Bishop
07-27-2004, 11:47 AM
Any blame or credit for what the movie ultimately became must rest with the director. One only need see TOTAL RECALL to realize the guy had a penchant of just letting loose...I enjoy the campy aspects of that one more than SHOWGIRLS, but the latter certainly has its moments, which means it has a certain amount of enjoyability you can only get from an unintentionally bad film. Not Eddie Wood calibre, perhaps, but then, nothing is! :D

:ed:

Wufnpoof
07-27-2004, 11:56 AM
A vile film, not quite as offensive as Basic Instinct. Starship Troopers, that's camp.

His earlier film, "The 4th Man," was interesting the first time - repeat visits did not impress.

Now Michael Verhoeven (apparently no relation) is an interesting filmaker.

poweragemk
07-27-2004, 11:57 AM
Paul Verhoeven is a genius, IMO. Every one of his movies that I've seen has been hilarious. I haven't seen Showgirls, but it sounds quite a bit like his other films - totally and completely misunderstood to be serious (or incompetent), when it's best enjoyed as campy-intentionally bad melodrama. This applies to his films that are regarded as 'good' as well as 'bad' - you can enjoy "Basic Instinct" or "Robocop" on the same level as you enjoy "Starship Troopers!"
Yes, he goes WAY further than most directors would and leaves virtually nothing to the imagination in the realms of violence and sex. No, none of his actors seem to be able to act. These are not drawbacks, though - actually essential to his style.

It's too bad that the lead actress got blackballed, though. It was a brave role to take on...

dcooper
07-27-2004, 12:05 PM
There was only one redeeming character in that movie, and that was the woman who took in Elizabeth Berkley's character after her suitcase had been stolen. This woman only has one dream in life, to meet this Michael Bolton-on-steroids rock star. When she finally meet her idol, he rapes her. Terrific...

Ed Bishop
07-27-2004, 01:22 PM
Well, there's vile and then there's vvile, heh....Verhoeven's work is so over the top and crazy no way in hell any viewer can take it seriously, even if he, the writer, producers and cast did....on the other hand, I remember the sick feeling I got watching Bob Fosse's final film, STAR 80, about a Playboy playmate, Dorothy Stratten, her life, and horrific death, a murder/suicide gig courtesy of her pathetic husband....that one leaves a dark, sad feeling, because you know it was done dead serious, but with malicious intent, since Fosse seemed to blame Hefner for what happened, which was absurd.

I found SHOWGIRLS to be in the same weird class as THE LEGEND OF LYLAH CLARE an VALLEY OF THE DOLLS, films so tawdry and laughably written and acted it made an act of self-loathing like THE OSCAR seem like a masterwork...:D

Still, for a rainy popcorn afternoon, give me SGT. PEPPER and Frampton....

:ed:

dwmann
07-27-2004, 01:53 PM
Personally, I really LIKED Showgirls, and thought it encapsulated that whole scene very well. I know some people involved in the business that really liked it, too. Sure, it has kind of surreal over the top quality to it, but so do most of Verhoeven's films, going all the way back to his work in Europe. Verhoeven ALWAYS attacks his subject matter from a weird perspective. Other than that, it's fairly accurate.

Yes, the characters are shallow and one dimensional, but so are most of the people the characters are modeled on. Maybe the film is soulless sleaze, but so is the world it portrays. The dialog and characterizations a pretty realistic IMO. I've heard stranger conversations than serious discussions of eating dog food. No, there's no subtext. THERE ISN'T SUPPOSED TO BE. These people don't HAVE any subtext.

As for Elizabeth Berkley's performace, I thought it was fantastic. Until reading this, I had no idea who she was - I'd always assumed Verhoeven found a real stripper somewhere.

I'm not suprised the film has been revived as a camp comedy, but I think a lot of people have missed the point. I don't think it IS a camp comedy. I think that to the extent Verhoeven is ever serious about anything, Showgirls is a serious film. However, if you accept this film on an intellectual level as anything BUT a camp comedy, you start to realize Verhoeven has painted a VERY dark picture of part of the American culture, and by extension, the culture as a whole. So in a sense, I think it is a very political film, and I'm not suprised the film bombed as it did, because that's not the kind of message most people really want to hear.

Anyway, I wouldn't be at all suprised if Showgirls ended up in the Criterion Collection one of these days with commentary from Verhoeven, who I'm sure would welcome a chance to defend his film, and perhaps an honest documentary on what this world is really like.

Joe D.
07-27-2004, 04:26 PM
[QUOTE=Snip

Still, for a rainy popcorn afternoon, give me SGT. PEPPER and Frampton....

:ed:[/QUOTE]


Ed, you are one sick cat! :eek:

Joe

ascot
07-27-2004, 04:29 PM
My only memory of this movie was an incredible urge to go swimming afterwards. :D

xios
07-27-2004, 05:40 PM
It's just a vile movie, a career killer for all involved (except maybe Gina Gershon, who's now a lesbian icon because of Bound). I see no larger cultural statement in it.

LeeS
07-27-2004, 09:04 PM
Bound was an excellent movie in terms of storyline and direction IMHO.