PDA

View Full Version : I Saw The Concert For George (long)


PMC7027
10-10-2003, 06:30 AM
The Concert For George

I saw this at the Loews Theatre in Cherry Hill, New Jersey on Wednesday October 8, 2003. I shared the 8:20 PM showing with 3 other people in a 90 seat theatre. Until 2 minutes before the start of the picture I was the only person in the theatre, so naturally I picked a seat that I thought would be in the best position sonically. I positioned myself so my eyes were just above mid-screen height and centered in front of the screen. I was three rows from the back of the small theatre so I wouldn’t have to deal with any boundary effects in the bass. I also wanted a little breathing room between the rear speakers and me. Boy was I surprised when I discovered that the movie was being shown in mono, with only the speakers behind the screen playing!
I was so impressed with The Concert For George that it seemed to last only a few minutes. The photography was beautiful and the editing, thank goodness, was not in the MTV "quick-cutting" style. The camera stayed on the various players for as long as it took to convey the emotion of the performance.
So many things ran through my mind as I watched I wish I had brought a tape recorder to capture my thoughts. It was so obvious that the performers really loved George and had checked their egos at the door (except for one who I shall discuss later). I enjoyed the numerous times that the "action" switched to the rehearsal to show a bit of the behind the scenes activities. Dhani Harrison wearing the "Stamp Out The Beatles" sweatshirt at the rehearsal was great! I certainly don’t know if that was the same sweatshirt that George used to have, but it captured George's spirit perfectly. Watching Dhani on stage, sometimes concentrating so hard on his guitar playing that his face looked pained (or worried), was a treat. Although instrumentally he was a very small part of the show he worked VERY hard. I'm sure he was unbelievably nervous up on the stage of the Royal Albert Hall. I couldn't help comparing Dhani's part, which I'm sure he discussed beforehand with Olivia, with Sean Lennon's part in the John Lennon tribute that was televised a couple of years ago.
On that occasion Yoko thrust Sean on us by having him perform both solo numbers and as a trio, if I remember. All of the other performers were accomplished (at least in terms of music sales) artists. Sean did not even belong on the stage with them, in my opinion. Similarly, Dhani, from an accomplishment point of view, didn't belong on stage with the other players. Rather than Olivia thrusting him on us she let him (or he decided to) play a very small musical part. Just watching him revealed the entire spectrum of human emotion.
I've always been a fan of Eric Clapton, but because this movie my appreciation of him has increased enormously. Eric sang and played beautifully, but more importantly, he "felt" every song during the show. It was so obvious that he really loved George and wanted George's music to be appreciated by the audience. Eric also did a beautiful job playing the acoustic guitar during the performance by the Indian musicians of Ravi Shankar's composition for George.
Jeff Lynne also did a great job, in my opinion. He willingly played "second fiddle" on many of the performances singing backup and playing rhythm guitar. When he took the mic to sing lead it was easy to tell that he really "felt" George's words. His singing of The Inner Light, combined with Ravi's daughter's sitar playing was especially moving.
Ringo was typically Ringo. He sang Photograph and Honey Don't and played drums on many other songs. I found it interesting, at least in the songs showed during the film, that Ringo didn’t seem to play drums on many of the Beatles numbers. I wonder if he still thinks as he did during the "Give My Regards To Broad Street" days?
I didn't want to like Billy Preston because of his "off stage" legal problem, but he was fantastic! It was obvious that he loved being on the stage, and his lead vocal performance on My Sweet Lord was heartfelt. I was touched to see him put his arm around Ringo during one of the performances.
Maybe I'm overly critical, but I was upset with Paul McCartney. Before playing Something he told the same "ukulele" story that he did about a hundred times during his tour. Playing guitar and singing All Things Must Pass upset me, because that could have been a Beatles song if only Paul had shown some interest in it during the "Get Back" sessions. I have a theory as to why the performance of Something changed in the middle of the song from Paul on the uke to the entire band. When Paul was at the microphone the concert seemed to become a Paul McCartney show. No other voices were heard and the emotional spotlight seemed to shine too brightly on him. By having the entire "band" come in the spotlight went back on George's music. The entire night, other than when Paul sang, came across as a group of musicians playing together. When Paul sang it came across as a group backing Paul.
I don’t want to end my ramblings on a negative note because I really loved the experience of seeing The Concert For George on the big screen. I’m sorry I didn’t get to hear it in 5.1 surround, but it really didn’t matter. I was swept away by the emotion of the event. I look forward to the DVD, but I look forward more to watching this film and singing along with the crowds at Beatlefest next year. A splendid time is guaranteed for all!

-Ben
10-10-2003, 07:21 AM
I'm still puzzled by the lack of attendance to this film. It was the same when I went and it has been the same everywhere else. Just don't get it.
Oh well.

:confused:

RickH
10-10-2003, 07:24 AM
Originally posted by bencanas
I'm still puzzled by the lack of attendance to this film. It was the same when I went and it has been the same everywhere else. Just don't get it.
Oh well.

:confused:

I think that today's generation aren't interested in theatrical tribute concerts, especially about a subject not of their generation. As for me, I'll be there if I find out it's playing in my area.

jdw
10-10-2003, 08:07 AM
Originally posted by PMC7027

I didn't want to like Billy Preston because of his "off stage" legal problem

I've only heard rumours about what this problem is, so could somebody provide some details? Feel free to send me a PM if you feel the topic doesn't belong in this thread.

Thanks

John
Vancouver

PMC7027
10-10-2003, 08:12 AM
It was sexual and involved minors.

musicfan37
10-10-2003, 12:24 PM
Like I mentioned in another thread. There were only four of us in that huge theatre watching the film. Very sad.

JohnG
10-10-2003, 05:53 PM
I went to a Thursday afternoon matinee at 1215PM and there was 4 people total in the theater including me! One guy was on a respirator (like Christopher Reeves).

It was better that we were essentially alone because it did help us get into the movie (no distractions).

Plus I did get to enjoy the movie in 5.1+ Surround.
Many times I did take a mental note on how good this movies sounded in this theater.
Here's a perfect example of Surround Sound and nobody shows up to hear it.

ronbow
10-11-2003, 01:31 AM
The minimal attendance was not surprising, given that, here in St Louis at least, there was no advertising or publicity whatsoever. No display ad on the movie page, no television. (I saw it twice - on the first evening, the 9:30 showing had a dozen people; at a matinee this week, there were just 2 of us.)

I'm just happy I came across the notice on the Beatles Abbey Road site and called the theatre chain, otherwise I might not have been aware.

The lack of promotion is really puzzling, though. You would think after all of the production expense, there would have been some kind of budget for promotion, particularly since proceeds are being directed at George's foundation. I don't understand.

Uncle Al
10-11-2003, 04:18 AM
I wouldn't even know this had a theatrical release if I didn't read it here. As far as the low attendance, even among those in the know, I guess many people (myself included) have given up on theatrical versions of filmed concerts. All too often, the sound is not properly set up (as David mentioned), and the proper sound mix is a driving factor in the enjoyment of a filmed concert. I think that people can do this so much better in their own homes that the audience for this type of film has dwindled.

GabeG
10-12-2003, 12:17 PM
PMC, why in the world didn't you coplain to the theater manager about the mono sound.

I'm a complete bastard when I pay $11 for a film and the presentation is less than perfect. If the manager doesn't respond the way he should, I have demanded a refund. Usually, though, the manager is ok and it's simply a case of someone haaving not flicked a switch. The theater management needs to know that anything less than acceptable is unacceptable.

PMC7027
10-12-2003, 12:23 PM
Actually, the film was worth the $8.50 it cost me to see it. I was so thrilled by the film that I didn't even think about complaining. You're right I should have demanded a refund.

Seeing a stereo "music" movie in mono has happened to me before. I remember going with a group of friends to see Tommy when it came out at a theatre that advertised it being is stereo. It was also in glorious mono.