-=Rudy=-
09-04-2003, 01:25 PM
I'd like to stay under $500 if I could, but I'm looking for a decent film/slide scanner. I'm torn between a few models right now.
Minolta has two Dimäge models and, for the life of me, I barely see a difference between the two current models. The Dimäge Scan Dual III and Dimäge Scan Elite II are current models. As I can tell, dynamic range, resolution, bit depth, etc. are the same. Price for the Elite II, lowest I found was $599 (more like $699 at most other online shops), where the other retails regularly for under $299. An adapter for APS film is extra, just over $100.
http://www.minoltausa.com/eprise/main/MinoltaUSA/MUSAContent/CPG/CPGProducts?cname=scan
Canon's FS4000 boasts a higher resolution (4000 dpi), lower dynamic range (low-level light details would not be as good), and streets for about $550. Color bit depth might be comparable. BUT, the APS adapter is included. Hmmmm.
http://www.powershot.com/powershot2/fs4000/index.html
Canon's FS2720 matches the Minoltas' resolution (2720dpi), but only gets 12 bit color depth vs. 16. APS adapter is included.
http://www.powershot.com/powershot2/fs2720/index.html
Nikon's prices are out of my league.
Extras like the Digital ICE, dust removal, etc. aren't really that important to me. I don't even know if the increased resolution of the Canon would do all that much for me--I'd rather have accuracy in other areas rather than an ultimate high pixel count. If I can print something cleanly onto 8x10 in my photo printer, that's cool.
Any input? I think I'm leaning toward the Dimäge Scan Dual III. I don't see anything compelling me to spend so much more for diminishing returns.
TIA!
Minolta has two Dimäge models and, for the life of me, I barely see a difference between the two current models. The Dimäge Scan Dual III and Dimäge Scan Elite II are current models. As I can tell, dynamic range, resolution, bit depth, etc. are the same. Price for the Elite II, lowest I found was $599 (more like $699 at most other online shops), where the other retails regularly for under $299. An adapter for APS film is extra, just over $100.
http://www.minoltausa.com/eprise/main/MinoltaUSA/MUSAContent/CPG/CPGProducts?cname=scan
Canon's FS4000 boasts a higher resolution (4000 dpi), lower dynamic range (low-level light details would not be as good), and streets for about $550. Color bit depth might be comparable. BUT, the APS adapter is included. Hmmmm.
http://www.powershot.com/powershot2/fs4000/index.html
Canon's FS2720 matches the Minoltas' resolution (2720dpi), but only gets 12 bit color depth vs. 16. APS adapter is included.
http://www.powershot.com/powershot2/fs2720/index.html
Nikon's prices are out of my league.
Extras like the Digital ICE, dust removal, etc. aren't really that important to me. I don't even know if the increased resolution of the Canon would do all that much for me--I'd rather have accuracy in other areas rather than an ultimate high pixel count. If I can print something cleanly onto 8x10 in my photo printer, that's cool.
Any input? I think I'm leaning toward the Dimäge Scan Dual III. I don't see anything compelling me to spend so much more for diminishing returns.
TIA!