feinstein
01-17-2002, 09:34 AM
Steve or anyone else out there in the know,
Is it possible that a 2 channel SACD release could derive from some non-DSD mastering done for CD?
For example, on many of the Sony/Columbia 2 channel SACD's, they sound strangely and suspiciously similar to previous "20 bit remasters". They also carry the same remastering credits etc. "Kind of Blue", "Blood Sweat and Tears", "Lady In Satin" are examples of SACD's where I have the 20 bit remastered counterparts and where they sound suspiciously identical to those 20 bit remasters in both good ways and bad.
Could Sony be "deceiving us" by simply cutting SACD's from 20 or 24 bit CD master tapes and claiming that they're DSD mastered from the original analogue master tapes?
Is it possible that a 2 channel SACD release could derive from some non-DSD mastering done for CD?
For example, on many of the Sony/Columbia 2 channel SACD's, they sound strangely and suspiciously similar to previous "20 bit remasters". They also carry the same remastering credits etc. "Kind of Blue", "Blood Sweat and Tears", "Lady In Satin" are examples of SACD's where I have the 20 bit remastered counterparts and where they sound suspiciously identical to those 20 bit remasters in both good ways and bad.
Could Sony be "deceiving us" by simply cutting SACD's from 20 or 24 bit CD master tapes and claiming that they're DSD mastered from the original analogue master tapes?