Roger Ebert reviewing again . . .

[Pinknik]

at www.rogerebert.com. He doesn't cover all the new releases, understandably, but it's nice to have his reviews back, after months of substitutes. Hopefully, his recovery will continue unabated.

[Dillydipper]

Go Roger, go!

[shokhead]

:righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton: :righton:

[canoehead]

He's still the best, IMO. So glad he's back.

[Bahax]

Good news. I love Rog, and he even hates one of my favorite movies (Lair of the White Worm). I don't care.

Keep going, Rog!

"I know full well I'm expected to Suspend My Disbelief. Unfortunately, my disbelief is very heavy, and during Ocean's Thirteen, the suspension cable snapped." —Ebert

[tomhayes]

Good for him

[Dave D]

Roger's an inspiration.:righton:

[Mark]

Great news. There are so few reviewers whose opinions I seek out for movies, and he's right at the very top.

[jeffchisako]

Roger has always been favorite reviwer. He's super smart and a very good writer.

[AndrewS]

That's great news!

[PreciousRicky]

Great news indeed. One of the best writers around, and seems like a genuinely nice guy.

[Dan C]

Great news. He can't talk apparently, he's missing part of his jaw. But his outlook on life is amazing. After going through something like that I'd hardly be as upbeat as Roger. What a class act! :thumbsup:

dan c

[Evan L]

He probably won't ever return to the tv show, and that's a shame. :shake:


Evan

[Phlo]

Whatta trooper...love ya Rog!

[CusBlues]

Thanks a lot for the info. Roger Ebert is my favorite reviewer, and I have not visited his site much, since he was not reviewing movies. Now that he is back, I will be a more frequent visitor.

[Matt Wittman]

He probably won't ever return to the tv show, and that's a shame. :shake:


Evan

You never know with Roger.

[Dillydipper]

He probably won't ever return to the tv show, and that's a shame. :shake:

Never say "never", but prepare for the inevitable. I can't say I can accept Roeper becoming the "credentialed" one, even after all these years, because he's so "loose"; as much as I've enjoyed his guest "not/Ebert'"s, I think we need a stodgy, learned crank to offset him. Somebody who can effectively put him in his place, rather then just "agree to disagree".

[imwalrus]

at www.rogerebert.com. He doesn't cover all the new releases, understandably, but it's nice to have his reviews back, after months of substitutes. Hopefully, his recovery will continue unabated.

Actually, Roger's been writing reviews for print for the last couple months - although I think this is the first time he's posted so many at once.